The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday that employers must accommodate an employee's religion regardless of whether the employee explicitly requests it.
In an 8-1 decision, the court ruled that Abercrombie & Fitch violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it refused to hire Samantha Elauf for a job because she was wearing a hijab, which conflicted with the store's style policy to exemplify the "preppy look of the Ivy League."
The Abercrombie dress policy reinforces a stereotype that Ivy League…Lunes, Hunyo 1, 2015
HR experts assess Abercrombie accommodation ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday that employers must accommodate an employee's religion regardless of whether the employee explicitly requests it.
In an 8-1 decision, the court ruled that Abercrombie & Fitch violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when it refused to hire Samantha Elauf for a job because she was wearing a hijab, which conflicted with the store's style policy to exemplify the "preppy look of the Ivy League."
The Abercrombie dress policy reinforces a stereotype that Ivy League…
Mag-subscribe sa:
I-post ang Mga Komento (Atom)
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento